Search in:

“Defend” vs “Protect”

In hoplology, attack and defense are definitely considered distinct. Moreover, hoplology separates “defend” and “protect.” While in the common vernacular “defend” and “protect” are often used interchangeably, for hoplological purposes, while “protecting” and “defending” are somewhat related,  they are two distinct concepts.

Hoplologically, “to defend” is basically a single minded effort to keep one’s whole self (or group) from being harmed or damaged by an attacker. This might include fighting back, but not necessarily so. The concept of “whole self” is key in this. One generally does not defend one’s arm or leg or partial body area. Hoplologically, this general concept applies on a military level as well. “Defense,” in the tactical and strategic sense, implies the lowering of the enemy’s ability to mount an effective attack. In either case, an important aspect of “defense” is the mindset behind defending. Actively defending against an assault tends to be a single minded intent to keep from being harmed. Going on the attack in such a situation is typically a separate and often a secondary action. In a life-death or battlefield combat context, this can be mortally inefficient. The classical attempts to remedy this defense/offense dichotomy is by such notions as “the best defense is a good offense” or kobo itchi  – (攻防一致  “attack and defense are one”).

Hoplologically, “protect” is less an end goal than is “defend.” And it is more useful as a means to an offensive end. In personal combat, a shield, for example, is used for protecting parts of the body while in the midst of offensive action. And, as has been pointed out previously in regards to our combative training, “blocking” actions are done protectively but primarily as means to create openings or paths to the target. In particular, such blocking, while typically protective of a particular body part, must be offensive in intent.

Certainly a “protective” action can be used in defense, but it is its use in “defense” that the founder of one classical Japanese battlefield tradition was referring to when he stated, “the blocking mind is useless, a dead thing and weak.”

This entry was posted in Consciousness on by .

About Hunter B. Armstrong

As Director of the International Hoplology Society (established in 1976 by Donn Draeger), Hunter Armstrong is professionally engaged in the research and development of hoplology – the study of human combative behavior and performance. In his efforts to gain a broader perspective on hoplology, he has spent considerable time on field research in Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Sri Lanka, and India, researching the training and fighting arts of those areas. Starting in karate in the early 1960’s, he has been training consistently for the past fifty plus years. Now, primarily concentrating on classical Japanese battlefield martial arts, he has also trained in a number of Chinese combative arts. In addition to Asian weapons and fighting systems, Armstrong has researched and studied classical European weapons and fighting systems and the relationship of biomechanics to the development of weapons use. In particular, he has concentrated on the principles of efficient behavior in combat, especially as expressed in traditional martial cultures.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this:
Visit us on YouTubeVisit us on FacebookVisit us on TwitterVisit us on GooglePlus